If there was no government, wouldn't there be chaos
Everybody running round, setting petrol bombs off?
And if there was no police force, tell me what you'd do
If thirty thousand rioters came running after you?
And who would clean the sewers? Who'd mend my television?
Wouldn't people lay about without some supervision?
Who'd drive the fire engines? Who'd fix my video?
If there were no prisons, well, where would robbers go?

And what if I told you to Fxxk Off?

What if there's no army to stop a big invasion?
Who'd clean the bogs and sweep the floors? We'd have all immigration.
Who'd pull the pint at the local pub? Where'd I get my fags?
Who'd empty out my dustbins? Would I still get plastic bags?
If there were no hospitals, and no doctors too,
If I'd broken both my legs, where would I run to?
If there's no medication, if there were no nurses,
Wouldn't people die a lot? And who would drive the hearses?

And what if I told you to Fxxk Off?

If there were no butchers shops, what would people eat?
You'd have everybody starving if they didn't get their meat.
If there was no water, what would people drink?
Who'd flush away the you-know-what? But of course MINE never stink.
What about the children? Who'd teach them in the schools?
Who'd make the beggers keep in line? Learn them all the rules?
Who's tell us whitewash windows? When to take down doors?
Tell us make a flask of tea and survive the holocaust?


I hope you read that =]

Anarchy is what we need. If we abolished government, the world would be free to run on its own again; people could be people. It would mean that we would not be under constant threat of a nuclear attack just because our governments disagree; instead it would be Joe Bill and Ahmad could duel it out by themselves without putting millions of other innocent people at risk for a conflict that is not theirs.

"If there were no butchers shops, what would people eat?" gives way to the misconceptions surrounding the form of "non-government". Sure enough, butcher shops would probably cease to exist, but BUTCHERS (the people WITH the skill) would still be around. In order to survive in an Anarchist world a trade would be necessary.

 Say Farmer Pete wants to get 15lbs of pork. He goes to Butcher Steve and asks for 15lbs of pork. Butcher Steve says "I'll give you 15lbs of pork, but I need 15lbs of grain to keep my pigs fed". Farmer Pete hands over 15lbs of his food source to Butcher Steve in exchange for 15lbs of his food source.

"What about the children? Who'd teach them in the schools?". Honestly. Look at the last paragraph and think: the only thing necessary to survive would be a trade. As a child, your father or mother could teach you how to sew seeds, make clothing, etc. That would be all you would need, except for basic survival skills needed to survive in the world itself. Reading and writing could come from someone who carries the "trade" or ability to do so, and for labour or goods in return an education system would thrive.

"What if there's no army to stop a big invasion?". Anarchy would abolish borders and government. No governments quarelling over land would mean no invasions. Everybody owns everything, therefore land is everyone's to trod.

"Who'd make the beggars keep in line?". Beggars wouldn't exist. I bet in an Anarchist society, beggars would be the fittest in the "survival of the fittest" philosophy. Thy already own nothing, they make livings off of nothing, and I'll bet you anything that they would be able to whip "trades" up out of nowhere. Beggars would no longer exist, and they'd have jobs in society with the ability to do something with their lives.

 "Who'd pull the pint at the local pub?". No need to go the pub for a drink anymore. Simply exchange goods or labour for the brewmaster for a pack of beer. 'Nuff said.

 

"Wouldn't people lay about without some supervision?". The point exactly. In an Anarchist state, there would be no work. You could lay around all day, and since there would be no society, you harm no one but yourself. Plus, as long as you can successfully execute your trade for goods to help you survive, you are your own boss; you decide your own hours.

 

"And if there was no police force, tell me what you'd do, If thirty thousand rioters came running after you?". Aren't riots usually the cause of some stupid act brought forth by the government? In the Anarchist state, you would set your own conditions and environment. You would be in control of your own government; if something doesn't work out, blame yourself. Now tell me what you'd do? In my case, would I hold a picket sign saying "Mike Cleveland is a major dumbass!". Exactly. No.

 

"If there were no hospitals, and no doctors too,
If I'd broken both my legs, where would I run to?
If there's no medication, if there were no nurses,
Wouldn't people die a lot? And who would drive the hearses?". We're too affiliated with our European roots and governing systems. Before we showed up in North America, the Native Americans had their own forms of medicine and treatments. So, I've said it before: trades. It's pretty easy to see that if government disappeared, the doctors wouldn't. Medicine could be achieved through natural remedies and treatments. As for the hearses part: animals die in nature all the time; they drop where they die. Do they cause problems? No, because nature cleans it up. I'm not saying that you would want to live in a place littered with rotting corpses; any person in their right mind would bury them properly. I'm just saying that if you're all alone, and you drop dead in the middle of nowhere, no one is going to know, therefore no one would care.

 

"If there were no prisons, well, where would robbers go?". Why would anyone have to steal anymore? Unless you're some lazy-assed individual who is too laid back to do work, gaining possessions would not be based on how much money you have. Plus, since money would not exist, it would not be hard to regain what you just lost.

"And what if I told you to Fxxk Off?". Haha. Well, in an anarchist world, you would be free to do so. Actually, in any free society you'd be able to do so. It's survival of the fittest, and if you get offended by it, then you are the weakest link; good bye =]

Now, we all know that the world would NEVER abolish its borders, governments, etc. Why? Because the world has gotten greedy and power hungry. I believe that if the world did dissolve the ruling classes, we could achieve a Utopia. Yes. Most of you know me as Mike Cleveland, Communist. But, now I oficially have changed to Anarchy. All the hard line Anarchists out there will probably tell me "You just can't change, you fag". Well, obviously I just did. It is my dream to hopefully see Utopia, before Heaven, so that the world will finally be able to cool itself off, tension-wise. This is why we need revolts, rebellions, etc. I hope you see it my way, and hopefully give Anarchist views a shot. Finally, we would live in a classless society. It would eliminate poverty, hunger, unemployment, EVERYTHING that has stopped one human from advancing at the same rates other humans have. If you don't understand what I mean, imagine if Darfur had no government that was constantly coming down on them. Imagine THAT. So, in this time of turmoil throughout the world, let's try to make a change.

  

This was composed about 2 years ago. Just retrieved it off one of my old spaces. Some-what innocent, and misinformed, but it gets the point across.